Emma Perry Deletes Savage Instagram Post Bashing Ericka Over Jamal — But Screenshots Never Die

Emma Perry hit delete — but the internet never forgets. On October 23, the 90 Day: Hunt for Love star posted a lengthy, scathing Instagram Story aimed directly at fellow cast member Ericka Ajanae’ Webb. Then, well before the usual 24-hour expiration, she wiped it. The problem? Screenshots were already circulating — including the sign-off: “Byeeee b*tch.”

What Emma Actually Wrote

Emma did not sugarcoat a single word. “I don’t usually give the irrelevants attention but certain things just annoy me,” she began: “This girl talked to Jamal for literally 24 hours… 24 HOURS.” She questioned why Ericka kept posting about a man who “had never chosen her,” then landed the detail that sent comment sections into chaos: Ericka had blocked her on Instagram — but not Jamal. “Weird energy,” Emma called it. Final shot: Jamal “did not want her and never had.” Then: “Byeee b*tch.”

The Trigger: Ericka’s “Fumbled Her” Bragging

According to the report, Emma was set off after Ericka took to Instagram to brag — claiming Jamal had “fumbled” her on national television. That rubbed Emma the wrong way for a simple reason: in her view, there was nothing to fumble. She says Jamal spent barely a day with Ericka during filming, and that the whole thing was “scripted for the show.”

That claim hits differently when you remember the standings: Emma and Jamal have officially announced they chose each other on Hunt for Love Season 2. Meanwhile, Ericka insists production cut her best scenes with Jamal — and Emma’s reaction suggests those claims hit a nerve.

The Post — and the Delete

Here is the part that raised eyebrows: Emma did not leave the Story up for the full 24 hours. She deleted it much earlier than usual — allegedly after Jamal and the show’s producers asked her to take it down. That claim has not been confirmed, but the timing is certainly suspicious. A Story vanishes early, right as screenshots start flying around fan pages. You do the math.

If that request really happened, it raises an obvious question: why did the post need to come down so fast? One fan theory: Emma’s wording may have backfired — her post implied Jamal’s flirtation with Ericka was part of the show’s storyline, not genuine romance. Not the best look for the couple that just declared they “chose each other.”

“24 Hours”: Emma’s Bombshell Claim About the Show

Buried in the drama is the biggest claim of all: Emma says Jamal’s time with Ericka was “scripted.” If true, that reframes a chunk of Season 2 as producer-driven. But honesty matters here: this is Emma’s claim, reported by a fan news site. Neither TLC nor the producers have commented — and Ericka tells a very different story, where real scenes with Jamal were cut to make her look like an afterthought.

The truth probably sits somewhere in the messy middle, which is exactly where reality TV thrives. What is certain is that the Jamal-Ericka-Emma triangle — the necklace swap on night one, the necklace take-back, the pre-filming hookup Emma revealed in episode two, and Ericka branding Jamal a “confused little boy” — has become the defining storyline of Hunt for Love Season 2.

What We Know vs. What’s Still Unconfirmed

Know: Emma posted the Story (screenshots exist). Know: she deleted it early. Know: Ericka insists Jamal “fumbled” her and her scenes were cut. Unconfirmed: whether Jamal or producers ordered the deletion — and whether the Jamal-Ericka connection was scripted, as Emma claims.

So the fandom has to pick a lane: is Emma fiercely defending her man after another woman kept stirring the pot — or did she cross a line and bully a fellow cast member, then try to erase the evidence? Team Emma or Team Ericka? Drop your take in the comments.